Robert Schindler

Dr. Robert M. Schindler

Professor

Office: BSB 253

Phone: (856) 225-6716

Ph.D., University of Massachusetts

Research Interests:  Price endings and numeric information processing; motivational processes in consumer price promotions; prediction and formation of consumer preferences; word-of-mouth communication on the Internet; consumer decisions regarding insurance; spirituality and consumer behavior

Courses Taught:  Principles of Marketing; Pricing Strategies; Spirituality in Business

Professional Activities & Honors:

  • Ranked 4th, number of pricing research articles adjusted for multiple authorship (Journal of Business Research, 2012)
  • Award for Lifetime Achievement in Pricing Research.  Fordham University Pricing Center, 2007
  • Chancellor’s Award for Teaching Excellence.  Rutgers University, Camden, 2009.
  • Editorial Review Board, Psychology & Marketing
  • Member: Association for Consumer Research, American Marketing Association

Representative Publications:

Books:

Articles:

  • Isaac, M.S., Y. Wang, and R.M. Schindler, “The Round-Number Advantage in Consumer Debt Payoff,” in press, Journal of Consumer Psychology.
  • Schindler, R.M., V. Lala, and J.E. Taylor, “Born to Shop? A Genetic Component of Deal Proneness,” in press, Journal of the Association for Consumer Research.
  • Bahl, S., Milne, G., Ross, S., Mick, D., Grier, S., Chugani, S., Chan, S., Gould, S., Cho, Y., Dorsey, J., Schindler, R., Murdock, M., & Boesen-Mariani, S. (2016). Mindfulness: Its Transformative Potential for Consumer, Societal, and Environmental Well-Being. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 35(2), 198-210. (PDF)
  • Isaac, M.S. and R.M. Schindler (2014), “The Top-Ten Effect: Consumers’ Subjective Categorization of Ranked Lists,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (April), 1181-1202 (PDF).
  • Holbrook, M.B. and R.M. Schindler (2013), “Comment on ‘Is There a Song-Specific Age? – A Replication of Holbrook & Schindler’s 1989 Study,’” Musicae Scientiae, 17 (3), 305-308. (PDF)
  • Schindler, R.M. and B. Bickart (2012), “Perceived Helpfulness of Online Consumer Reviews:
    The Role of Message Content and Style,” Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11 (May/June), 234-243. (PDF)
  • Schindler, R.M., H.G. Parsa, and S. Naipaul (2011), “Hospitality Managers’ Price-Ending Beliefs: A Survey and Applications,” Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 52 (4), 421-428. (PDF)
  • Scammon, D.L., P.A. Keller, P.A. Albinsson, S. Bahl, J.R. Catlin, K.L. Haws, J. Kees, T. King, E.G. Miller, A.M. Mirabito, P.C. Peter, and R.M. Schindler (2011), “Transforming Consumer Health,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 30 (Spring), 14-22. (PDF)
  • Schindler, R.M. (2009), “Patterns of Price Endings Used in U.S. and Japanese Price Advertising,” International Marketing Review, 26 (1), 17-29. (PDF)
  • Schindler, R.M. (2008), “Blessings and the Spiritual Life of Consumers,” comment in Journal of Business Research, 61 (May), 542-543. (PDF)
  • Schindler, R.M. (2006), “The 99-Price Ending as a Signal of a Low-Price Appeal,” Journal of Retailing, 82 (1), 71-77. (PDF)
  • Schindler, R.M. and R.F. Yalch (2006), “It Seems Factual, But Is It? Effects of Using Sharp Versus Round Numbers in Advertising Claims,” Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 33, C. Pechmann and L.L. Price (eds.), Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research, 586-590. (PDF)
  • Bizer, G.Y. and R.M. Schindler (2005), “Direct Evidence of Ending Digit Drop-Off in Price Information Processing.”  Psychology & Marketing, 22 (October), 771-783. (PDF)
  • Schindler, R.M. and Bickart, B. (2005), “Published Word of Mouth: Referable, Consumer-Generated Information on the Internet,” in Online Consumer Psychology: Understanding and Influencing Consumer Behavior in the Virtual World, C.P. Haugtvedt, K.A. Machleit, and R.F. Yalch (eds.), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 35-61. (PDF)

Selected Earlier Publications:

  • Schindler, R.M. (2004), “Fine Tuning a Retail Price,” Retail Navigator, Vol. 2 (Summer), https://www.retailnavigator.net/two.asp. (PDF)
  • Simmons L.C. and R.M. Schindler (2003), “Cultural Superstitions and the Price Endings Used in Chinese Advertising,” Journal of International Marketing, 11 (2), 101-111. (PDF)
  • Schindler, R.M. and T.M. Kibarian (2001), “Image Communicated by the Use of 99 Endings in Advertised Prices,” Journal of Advertising, 30 (Winter), 95-99. (PDF)
  • Schindler, R.M. (1998), “Consequences of Perceiving Oneself as Responsible for Obtaining a Discount: Evidence for Smart-Shopper Feelings,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7 (4), 371-392. (PDF)
  • Schindler, R.M. and P.N. Kirby (1997), “Patterns of Rightmost Digits Used in Advertised Prices: Implications for Nine-Ending Effects,” Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (September), 192-201. (PDF)
  • Schindler, R.M. and T.M. Kibarian (1996), “Increased Consumer Sales Response Through Use of 99-Ending Prices,” Journal of Retailing, 72 (Summer), 187-199. (PDF)
  • Schindler, R.M. (1995), “Quick Choices As Targetable Units of the Consumer Decision Process,” in Research in Marketing, Vol. 12, J. Sheth and A. Parvatiyar (eds.), Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 219-250. (PDF)
  • Schindler, R.M. (1994), “Consumer Motivation for Purchasing Low-Deductible Insurance,” in Marketing and Public Policy Conference Proceedings, Vol. 4, D.J. Ringold (ed.), Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, 147-155. (PDF)

Media Guide

Dr. Robert Schindler, professor of marketing at the Rutgers School of Business—Camden; author, numerous articles in business, academic and general publications. He can discuss:

Advertising:

• Advertising and pricing strategies

• Retail promotions (coupons and price promotions)

• Development of consumer preferences and tastes

• Psychological mechanisms of marketing techniques

Retail Issues:

• Advertising and pricing strategies

• Retail promotions (coupons and price promotions)

• Social meaning of money in the United States

• Shopping behavior

Consumer Behavior and Research:

• Advertising and pricing strategies

• Retail promotions (coupons and price promotions)

• Development of consumer preferences and tastes

• Psychological mechanisms of marketing techniques

• Social meaning of money in the United States

• Shopping behavior

Scroll to Top

BLDP Shadowing Days Application

After being notified of a match, students are responsible for providing personal information to the matched executive (e.g., current resume and cover letter with information on career ambitions). The information on this application is for internal use only, for us to match you as well as possible with and executive from among our alumni database.

BLDP Application

The Spring 2021 Application is now open! 

Priority will be given to applications received by Sunday, November 15, 2020. Applications are accepted until all seats are filled. Space is limited, so apply early!

The seminar application process is our gateway for entry into the program. Upon acceptance into BLDP, students will be emailed their acceptance letter plus a special permission number allowing registration for the BLDP seminar.

Requirements

Seminar applications are solicited each semester and require

  1. completed application form (submitted online and found elsewhere on this website),
  2. a personal essay, and
  3. two letters of recommendation (one academic; one other).

Rutgers-Camden students are invited to apply to apply for enrollment in the BLDP seminar. All applicants are expected to meet both of the following selection criteria:  Have sophomore standing or above and have an overall GPA of 3.0 or above. First-semester transfer students will be evaluated based on their GPA earned at Rutgers. Students who fail to meet these admission criteria may still be allowed to apply for (and possibly enroll in) the BLDP seminar, but they will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

The director balances evaluations to make final decisions on people accepted for the seminar (up to a maximum of 15-20 each semester).

Students who are admitted to the BDLP are rquired to adopt the BLDP Code of Conduct. A signed contract is required from each student.

Students may count activities toward “leadership units” that were initiated prior to taking a seminar, as long as those activities occur primarily during their enrollment in their academic program.

Application for Admission to BLDP Seminar

Applications For BLDP Seminar will be ongoing until class is filled.

  • * Indicates a required field.

  • Contact Information

  • Academic Information

  • Please enter a number from 0 to 500.
  • Transfer students only.
  • Employment Information

  • List relevant employment history

  • EmployerPositionDates of Employment 
  • School Leadership Information

  • Provide evidence of leadership initiative while enrolled in school by listing all school-based organizations and activities in which you have held a leadership role while a student.

  • OrganizationRoleDates 
  • Community Leadership Information

  • Provide a list of community or volunteer activities in which you engaged in a leadership role.

  • OrganizationRoleDates of Activity 
  • Essay

  • Please write a short essay between 150 to 350 words, in which you discuss the reasons why your application should be considered for the Business Leader Development Program, including what you hope to gain from the program and what you can contribute.

  • Additional Submission Instructions

  • For your application to be complete, this form and TWO REFERENCE LETTERS must be on file in the Director's office. Ideally, you will receive one letter from an academic source (e.g., a former or current instructor), and one from a business source (e.g., a former employer - even if for a part-time or volunteer position). Your letter writers should mail them directly to: Dr. Oscar Holmes IV, Associate Dean of Undergraduate Programs, Rutgers University, School of Business, 227 Penn Street, Camden, NJ 08102 or email the letters to oscar.holmesiv@rutgers.edu.

    Please only submit one application. If you experience any technical problems or need to submit the application again, please contact ldrshp@camden.rutgers.edu.

    Thank you.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.